Organizational Settlements: Theorizing How Organizations Respond to Institutional Complexity
نویسندگان
چکیده
Research on hybrid organizations and institutional complexity commonly depicts the presence of multiple logics within organizations as an exceptional situation. In this article, we argue that all organizations routinely adhere to multiple institutional logics. Institutional complexity only arises episodically, when organizations embrace a newly salient logic. We propose two concepts to develop this insight. First, we suggest the notion of organizational settlement to refer to the way in which organizations durably incorporate multiple logics. Second, we define organizational hybridization as a change process whereby organizations abandon their existing organizational settlement and transition to a new one, incorporating a newly salient logic. Overall, we propose a shift in attention from the exceptionality of hybrid configurations of multiple logics toward exploring the dynamics of transitions from one state of complexity to another.
منابع مشابه
Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional Logics, Complex Organizations, and Actor Identities: the Case of Nonprofits
We propose a novel approach to theorizing hybridity in public and nonprofit organizations. The concept of hybridity is widely used to describe organizational responses to changes in governance, but the literature seldom explains how hybrids arise or what forms they take. Transaction cost and organizational design literatures offer some solutions, but lack a theory of agency. We use the institut...
متن کاملInstitutional Equivalence: How Industry and Community Peers Influence Corporate Philanthropy
T paper explores how organizations respond to simultaneous institutional influences from two distinct sources: the industry in which they operate and the local geographic community in which they are headquartered. We theorize that the existence of institutional equivalents—other organizations at the same intersection of different fields, such as the same industry and the same community—provides...
متن کاملTheorizing Technological Adaptation as a Trigger for Institutional Change
Institutional pressures and technological adaptation have frequently been expressed as contrasting forces that explain organizational processes and actions. Institutional arguments suggest that environmental pressure, deriving from regulative, cognitive, and normative forces predict organizational action (or inaction), and impel organizations to favor legitimacy over efficiency. Theories addres...
متن کاملAdapting to New Institutional Logics: The Response of Spanish Firms to Market Deregulation in the Post-Franco Era
Institutional logics guide social action. Research has examined outcomes of logics, including organizational strategies and structures, and demonstrated they are historically contingent. Less is known about the responses of organizations when logics change. Currently, the imagery is of organizations responding uniformly. Yet, a uniform response is unlikely. We examine how Spanish manufacturing ...
متن کاملInter - Organizational Institutions
Institutional Change Institutional approaches to the study of organizations provide an active and fruitful line of (1949) inquiry into how organizations become institutions, contemporary institutional analysis asks how organizations are influenced by institutionalized rules and institutional environments-forces that operate, by definition, above and across organizations. Much research documents...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016